Have you ever seen HDR nature photos that look fake? Unfortunately, so have I and I let it destroy my motivation to play around with HDR photography.
The collection of nature photos below shows how excessive the HDR (high dynamic range) photography technique can give you some unnatural looking photos. Does that mean HDR nature photos are all bad? Of course not!
Without singling out or bashing any other photographers work, take a close look at this screenshot of what a Google search on HDR nature gave me when I first posted this article.
Don't get me wrong, taking nature pictures using high dynamic range is a great photography technique to use if done right. Whether you use the recently developed in-camera capabilities or HDR software, this technique helps overcome the technological limitations of the the sensors in your digital camera. But first, a quick definition of HDR photography.
Just about all newer cameras can shoot HDR images. You just need a camera that can use any one of these 3 methods. Use a solid tripod for the best results.
HDR photography has evolved through a few stages and is now being used with better results. Similar to the excessive blurring of images taken with a LensBaby, and also too much portrait image retouching, it's a technology that was overused used.
When a new technique or a new technology first arises, it is often overused. Just because a capability becomes available, that doesn't mean it should be automatically used. It takes some time to learn when to use the technology. Here are two examples of when HDR technique should be used:
Don't forget, HDR photography involves several different photos (usually 3) and combining them. If anything in your composition moves you'll lose some sharpness and maybe even have disturbing blurry parts in your photo. Your photo won't look as good.
There are time when you want to keep the contrast where it is to get a certain look. Look at the contrasty photo below. I took this photo late on a steamy hot summer day. The air was brutally still. The knats were viciously attacking me and the sweat was dripping down my nose.
I shot directly into a mostly obscured sun and darkened the sky in Photoshop afterwards. The results were good enough for this image to be included in a display in an art gallery and as part of an outdoor exhibition in my hometown.
I did choose to use HDR technique because I wanted to get a silhouette type of effect. I did do some editing, but it wasn't HDR in nature. Here are few situation when to avoid using HDR:
Basically you intentionally overexpose images to capture better details in the dark shadow areas and combine them with intentionally underexposed photos which will capture details better in the bright highlight areas. You can accomplish this either in the camera with recent digital cameras, or you can do it afterwards with HDR software.
Then you combine them using a variety of simple or complex photo editing techniques.
Look at these three nature pictures on the right. Not an award winning subject, but stay with me here for a second.
I combined the underexposed image on top with the overexposed image in the middle to get the photo on the bottom.
I used Adobe Photoshop using a simple masking technique to hide and reveal various parts of the two photographs.
The photographs are layers that are visually stacked on top of each other, exactly registered.
You cannot do this particular technique without a tripod. Any movement of your subject including the movement of leaves caused by the wind will prevent you from using this photography technique.
The overexposed photo in the middle is close to the correct exposure. Some of the highlights where the sun was striking the leaves were overexposed.
The path looked properly exposed. I revealed parts of the underexposed photo in the foliage area, so that the path became more prominent in the finished photograph.
Using the right amount of HDR technique turns an overly contrasty scene into a stunning natural looking image. You can bring out the details in the shadow ares and maintain good details in the highlights at the same time.
This is just an introduction to the concept of HDR. I purchased Photomatrix Pro, which is software designed specifically to handle this technique. I never even open the box. I was so sick of seeing overdone HDR photos that I was completely turned off to HDR. No offense to the makers of this fine software.
There are several other options that I have been playing around with for HDR photography, most notably right within recent versions of Adobe PhotoShop itself.
Many of the very newest digital cameras have HDR capabilities built into their design. You simple set your camera to HDR mode and it will do the blending of exposures automatically. There are a lot of bizarre and unique nature and landscape photos using HDR techniques. Many of them are too surreal in my opinion. Sometimes when a new technology comes along it is at first over-employed.
Just because a technology exists does not automatically mean it is appropriate to use it. Don't get me wrong. Experimentation is a great thing to try. It is the root of expanding your artistic creativity. I recommend you remember what your intended result is, the making of an interesting photograph. It should come from your vision of what you want to express, not necessarily the need to use the latest technique like nature pictures-HDR.
I'd love to get your comments on this topic. What do you think about how HDR techniques are done? You can leave your comments below. Feel free to share one of your HDR images too. Keep shooting. Keep learning. Keep improving.